Ive invested the previous week or so evaluating a GeForce RTX 3060, Nvidias latest GPU, but Ive been able to do so just since the business sent a review system to Polygon. If youre a member of the public, its damn near difficult to get your hands on a graphics card from Nvidia or AMD.
All of this relates to a review of the RTX 3060 particularly due to the fact that its the most inexpensive offering in Nvidias 30-series line of GPUs, with an MSRP starting at $329.99. That happens to be the rate of the EVGA RTX 3060 XC Black Gaming, the card that Nvidia sent us due to the fact that the company isnt producing a Founders Edition for the RTX 3060.
Price-conscious players seeking a brand-new graphics card right now may be forced to purchase something at an inflated rate and/or get a various GPU than the RTX 3060. Considered in a vacuum, the RTX 3060 is an extremely good midrange graphics card for individuals aiming to play video games at resolutions up to 1440p. But we do not live in a vacuum, so the very best I can do is assess the GPU itself and provide some context about the current market.
An extreme fight in Wolfenstein: Youngblood.
Note the single eight-pin power port on top of the card.
Nvidia launched the RTX 3060 in late February, about 3 months after the launch of the RTX 3060 Ti. The RTX 3060, on the other hand, is a 1080p-oriented GPU at heart that can also deal with 1440p.
The RTX 3060 that Ive been checking is a standard dual-slot GPU with a set of big fans that keep the card fairly quiet. Ive noticed that there is a sound increase over my existing Gigabyte RTX 2060 Super– when it starts, the RTX 3060 is a bit louder– however that makes good sense, since the Gigabyte GPU features 3 fans.
The EVGA cards port variety consists of a single line of three DisplayPort 1.4 outputs and one HDMI 2.1 output. (I cant evaluate any HDMI 2.1 functions due to the fact that I dont have a display that supports it.) And unlike the more effective RTX 3060 Ti, the Founders Edition of which counts on Nvidias brand-new 12-pin power port, the RTX 3060 manages with one conventional eight-pin connection. It draws 170 W of power, with a recommended power supply of 550 W.
Image: MachineGames/Bethesda Softworks
In terms of how effective the RTX 3060 is, well, its not a slam-dunk upgrade unless youre originating from something as old as, state, a GTX 10-series card.
Now, thats possibly unsurprising for a GPU that is the least expensive ray tracing-capable card considering that Nvidia cut the price of the RTX 2060 to $299 in January 2020. And since Im originating from an RTX 2060 Super– which is just one generation old, having actually been released in July 2019– I didnt anticipate to be blown away by the RTX 3060. Its performance will depend greatly on the specifics of your own PC and, of course, the video games youre playing.
The RTX 3060 can certainly offer some substantial benefits over the RTX 2060 Super (and GPUs that are even older, certainly). Trying Wolfenstein: Youngblood at 1920×1200 on max settings, my average frame rate in both the Riverside and Lab X benchmarks leapt from roughly 124 frames per second with the RTX 2060 Super to around 170 fps with the RTX 3060– a boost of about 38%.
The enhancement was smaller sized however still excellent when I turned on ray tracing (which Youngblood supports just for reflections). In Riverside, the typical frame rate went from 88 fps with the RTX 2060 Super to 109 fps with the RTX 3060, an increase of almost 24%; in Lab X, the figure went from 75 fps to 91.5 fps, a 22% leap. And I had the ability to claw back a few frames while maintaining image quality by allowing Nvidias Deep Learning Super Sampling (DLSS) technology.
Wolfenstein: Youngblood criteria
RTX 2060 Super
RTX 2060 Super
Riverside (RTX on).
Laboratory X (RTX on).
Riverside (RTX & & DLSS on).
Lab X (RTX & & DLSS on).
A scene from Hitman 3s Dartmoor level.
Image: IO Interactive.
I likewise got great results with the RTX 3060 in Control, a great display for ray tracing. Playing with the RTX 3060 using those very same settings, the frame rate was normally in a more playable range of 60-75 fps, with unusual drops into the mid-50s.
My crusty PC and I had an extremely different experience with Hitman 3, a video game whose intricate underlying simulation relies greatly on CPU power. If youre stuck to a 4-year-old CPU that isnt even a Core i7 chip, like I am, bear in mind of my results.
At 1920×1200 on max settings, switching out my RTX 2060 Super for the RTX 3060 yielded frame rate improvements of less than 10% for the video games 2 static standards– from 99.92 fps to 106.92 fps in Dubai (7.01%), and from 103.85 fps to 112.99 fps in Dartmoor (8.8%). When I switched on supersampling at 1.3 x (to approximate running the game at a resolution around 1440p) and 2x (to approximate 4K), the gains ended up being even slimmer. With 2x supersampling enabled, the average frame rate in Dartmoor increased just from 42.68 fps to 43.87 fps– just 2.79%.
All screening was performed at 1920×1200 on max settings (” Mein leben!”). Figures represent typical frames per 2nd during the benchmark, balanced over two runs.
So whats the verdict? In my experience, you must have the ability to run video games on high to max settings with the RTX 3060 if youre gaming at 1080p/1200p. And youll see a substantial benefit if youre upgrading from anything older than Nvidias 20-series cards; even with ray tracing allowed, you can play at 60 fps as long as the game in concern also supports DLSS.
People with 1440p monitors would be much better served by the RTX 3060 Ti instead (if they can find it in stock, that is). While its possible that we might begin seeing a raft of games that would take advantage of the RTX 3060s 12 GB of GDDR6 video memory, its hard to picture the 8 GB of RAM on Nvidias other 30-series cards (other than for the RTX 3090) ending up being a significant bottleneck soon. And in his review of the RTX 3060 at The Verge, my colleague Sean Hollister discovered that the RTX 3060 Ti “often” performed “in between 15 percent and 35 percent quicker” than the RTX 3060 when video gaming on max settings at 1440p. At $399– a premium of $70, or 21.2%, over the RTX 3060s MSRP– youll simply get better value.
Of course, as Ive kept in mind, all of this is contingent upon in fact being able to find any of these graphics cards (and at their market prices, to boot). If you get the chance to purchase an RTX 3060 and it makes good sense for your specific scenario– your screen resolution, the age of the GPU you d be replacing, and your spending plan– its a solid card that should offer a noticeable upgrade. Youll have to make that require yourself.
The Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 is available now. This evaluation was performed utilizing an EVGA RTX 3060 XC Black Gaming supplied by Nvidia, on the authors PC, which contains an Intel Core i5-7500 CPU and 16 GB of RAM. All games checked were installed to a 2 TB 7200 rpm difficult drive.
Nvidia launched the RTX 3060 in late February, about 3 months after the launch of the RTX 3060 Ti. And unlike the more powerful RTX 3060 Ti, the Founders Edition of which relies on Nvidias brand-new 12-pin power adapter, the RTX 3060 gets by with one standard eight-pin connection. At 1920×1200 on max settings, switching out my RTX 2060 Super for the RTX 3060 yielded frame rate improvements of less than 10% for the video games 2 static criteria– from 99.92 fps to 106.92 fps in Dubai (7.01%), and from 103.85 fps to 112.99 fps in Dartmoor (8.8%). While its possible that we might start seeing a raft of games that would make the many of the RTX 3060s 12 GB of GDDR6 video memory, its difficult to imagine the 8 GB of RAM on Nvidias other 30-series cards (except for the RTX 3090) ending up being a considerable traffic jam quickly. And in his review of the RTX 3060 at The Verge, my coworker Sean Hollister discovered that the RTX 3060 Ti “practically always” performed “between 15 percent and 35 percent much faster” than the RTX 3060 when gaming on max settings at 1440p.