There are 16.8 million colors in this keyboard, according to Razer.
On the outdoors, the Razer Book 13 borrows a number of the Blade Stealth 13s signature functions. Razers three-headed snake decorates the lid. You may likewise acknowledge the adjustable per-key RGB keyboard with speaker grilles on each side. (Unlike what youll see on some more garish gaming rigs, the lighting on these keys looks professional and contributes to the advanced ambiance.) The chassis is CNC-machined aluminum, with a smooth metal finish. This is an elegant method of stating its rather good; the MacBook Pro is made from the very same material, as are much of the very best Windows laptop computers consisting of the XPS 13 and HPs Spectre x360 14.
For several years, Razer has actually made some of the best gaming laptops on the marketplace. Theyre not uniquely well-known for their high performance (Blades are effective devices but not the fastest out there) or their rates (which are high). Theyre popular for their high-quality develop and their premium design. In other words, Razer makes the best-looking video gaming laptop computers on the marketplace.
Razer has actually decided this year that this visual shouldnt be restricted to gaming laptop computers. In its first note pad created for productivity rather of gaming, Razer has actually integrated its signature look with a 60Hz 16:10 touchscreen and a lower-power processor with integrated graphics. The Razer Book intends to be a Razer Blade on the outdoors and a Dell XPS 13 on the inside– and it mainly is successful. Razer has actually made an exceptional laptop computer with efficiency matching that of the leading Windows clamshells on the marketplace. That said, its expensive for what it uses, and it has a couple of drawbacks that indicate it will not be the right option for everybody.
8.5 out of 10
However some subtle distinctions explain that this laptop computer is for the office, not for gaming. Its somewhat lighter than the Blade Stealth, at 0.6 inches thick and 3.09 pounds. The port choice is also better than that of the Stealth: there are 2 Thunderbolt 4 ports, one USB-A 3.2 Gen 1, one HDMI 2.0, one microSD slot, and one combination audio jack. This is likewise a huge advantage the Razer Book has more than the XPS 13 and MacBook Pro, both of which have comparably minimal choices.
The biggest change, though, is the 16:10 touch screen. This makes the screen taller than the 16:9 panels youll find on the Blade (and on nearly all dedicated video gaming laptops). It lends you lots of additional room for multitasking, with less scrolling and zooming necessary to see whatever you need to. Element ratio aside, the 1920 x 1200 display screen on our review unit was rather brilliant, maxing out at 494 nits in my screening. Its rather dynamic too, with brilliant and sharp colors. While the panel has a shiny texture, it sits back little to no glare in bright settings.
Evo is the 11th Gen version of Intels Project Athena program.
The Razer Books processor is powered up to 28W, with turbo boost accelerate to 4.7 GHz.
USB-C, USB-A, headphone jack on the left.
The color is called “mercury.”.
Thats the fastest time Ive ever gotten from a system with the quad-core 1165G7 (which powers numerous of the finest ultraportables on the market). The XPS 13 took 10 minutes and 43 seconds to complete the exact same task; the more powerful XPS 13 2-in-1 took 10 minutes and 5 seconds.
Razer still hasnt rather caught Apples M1 systems. The Blade Stealth 13 with a GTX 1650 Ti knocked out the export in just five minutes and 50 seconds.
The Razer Book balanced 142fps on Rocket Leagues optimum setting without dipping below 125; the XPS installed 111fps with a minimum of 100. Razer also wins on League of Legends, balancing 219fps to the Dells 205fps. Of course, given that both machines have a 60Hz screen, you will not observe a distinction in the quality of these games– but these numbers should provide you a sense of the Razer Books power.
Graphic performance will make something of a difference on heavier titles. The Razer Book beat the XPS on the more demanding Overwatch at Ultra settings, balancing 65fps to the XPSs 48fps. It also balanced 32fps on Shadow of the Tomb Raider at its lowest settings, where the XPS balanced 22fps. Thats substantial due to the fact that it indicates you could probably play Tomb Raider in 1080p on the Razer Book, which would be undesirable to do on the XPS.
Dynamic 16:10 screen
Attractive Blade-esque design
Per-key RGB keyboard
Miscellaneous laptop stuff: the glass touchpad is quite smooth and roomy– certainly one of my recent favorites. The speakers sound terrific, with strong percussion, though I did hear some distortion at higher volumes. And I nearly never get to say this, but the web cam isnt that bad; it delivers a relatively accurate and decent image, though theres no personal privacy shutter or eliminate switch.
In a vacuum, I have very couple of problems about the Razer Books chassis. I will point out that I find it slightly even worse than the XPS 13 in a couple of (subjective) areas. Not just is it thicker and much heavier than Dells flagship, but it simply looks and feels clunkier, doing not have the XPSs streamlined mobility. And while Razers keyboard and touchpad are both fine, theyre not as exceptional as either on the XPS; Dells keyboard has more travel and a more satisfying click, and its touchpad is a bit more comfy. A lot of frustratingly to me, Razer offers less storage for the price. You only get 256GB of storage in the base and midrange designs and can just get 512GB in the top-end $1,999 configuration– 512GB XPS models come as low as $1,399, and the $1,599 XPS has 512GB of storage while the $1,599 Razer Book has just 256GB (their specs are identical otherwise).
Theres one location where the Razer Book sturdily beats the XPS, and thats performance. All Razer Book designs are Evo-verified, suggesting Intel attests them as leading performers. And our test model includes a high-clocked (approximately 28W) variation of one of the chipmakers top ultrabook processors, Intels Core i7-1165G7.
In real-world performance, the Razer Book likewise shines. Of course, the XPS 13 is also rather excellent in these scenarios.
While the Book 13 is extremely not a gaming laptop, it is a Razer-branded product, so some might wonder how it video games. It solidly beats the XPS 13 clamshell and is about on par with the more powerful 2-in-1.
The Razer Book aims to be a Razer Blade on the outside and a Dell XPS 13 on the within– and it mostly succeeds. Theres one area where the Razer Book solidly beats the XPS, and thats performance. The Razer Book beat the XPS on the more requiring Overwatch at Ultra settings, averaging 65fps to the XPSs 48fps. In some locations (keyboard, touchpad, portability), the Razer Book is somewhat worse than the XPS 13. You can get a few hours more battery life from a number of laptops in the Razer Books class (including the XPS 13) and substantially more storage.
Just 256GB of storage in base and midrange models
Clunkier than some rivals
Battery life is simply alright
It provides some of the best incorporated graphics efficiency Ive seen from a Windows clamshell.
HDMI, USB-C, microSD on the.
When it pertains to cooling, the Razer Book has chops. It did a considerably much better task of keeping its CPU cool than the XPS performed in my screening. During the Adobe export, the 1165G7 remained comfortably in the mid-60s to mid-70s (Celsius) with periodic spikes as high as the low 90s. It mostly stayed in the high 50s throughout the Tomb Raider criteria, with spikes up to the mid-70s. All in all, I didnt see any throttling or slowdown, and the keyboard never got uncomfortably hot under load.
But youre making a compromise for all this power: battery life. Its not terrible, however its nothing to write house about. I got approximately six hours and 45 minutes while using the Book 13 for basic workplace deal with periodic Zoom calls and streaming at 200 nits of brightness. (This remained in the Battery Saver profile, which you can toggle in Razers Synapse software.) That implies I cant go a complete day without charging, though your mileage will differ based upon your settings and jobs. Ive overcome nine hours putting plenty of devices through that very same work, including the XPS 13.
The Razer Book 13 has a lot of things going for it, especially for Razer fans. Its definitely among the best ultraportable laptops you can buy– however whether its the very best is a complex concern to respond to.
That result also makes clear that– to restate– regardless of visual resemblance, this laptop computer is not a Blade. The Stealth 13 averaged 45fps on Tomb Raiders greatest settings.
In some areas (keyboard, touchpad, portability), the Razer Book is slightly worse than the XPS 13. In others (display quality and develop quality) its about on par. And it brings a few clever functions (the port choice and the RGB keyboard) that Dells clamshell doesnt have– but I question those are making or breaking the buying decision for the majority of people. On internet, I think Razer comes out slightly even worse on the chassis front.
However thats not where the Razer Book makes its case. That classification is performance. Compared to other Windows clamshells Ive tested in the previous year, the Razer Book is top of the class. It sticks out in efficiency and media work along with video gaming. On the other hand, youre making some sacrifices for that power, in addition to the hefty cost it brings. You can get a couple of hours more battery life from a number of laptop computers in the Razer Books class (including the XPS 13) and considerably more storage as well. For folks in the Books designated audience (users looking for a portable work or home entertainment driver) those compromises are most likely worth thinking about.
Eventually, the Razer Book 13 is an outstanding brand-new laptop computer from Razer with a lot to like, and Im sure lots of consumers will enjoy with it. Those compromises imply I cant rather call it the finest product for many people.