Activision sues indie dev over Warzone name in Call of Duty dispute – Polygon3 min read

PS4] I send the same reply to each of them: Warzone and Call of Duty: Warzone are various video games. You should get in touch with Activision,” stated Ficker in his post.

On April 8, Activision submitted a protest versus the indie developer behind the browser-based technique video game Warzone. The complaint is over the use and hallmark rights for the “Warzone” title, which the two business have actually remained in disagreement about for the last several months.
The main dispute is over whether or not Activision can utilize “Warzone” as part of the title for its Call of Duty battle royale, and whether or not it can trademark the name. The Warzone method video game was established by Randy Ficker, who is not named in the complaint and is rather identified as
Ficker first published his technique video game in 2017, however he didnt file a hallmark for the name until October 2020. Meanwhile, Call of Duty: Warzone was launched in March 2020, with a trademark very first filed in June 2020.
According to Activision, on Nov. 20, 2020, Warzone.coms counsel sent a cease and desist letter “demanding that Activision alter the name of its games, stop utilizing Warzones WARZONE mark, and abandon the hallmark applications.” Activision also claims that has actually threatened legal action against the company over the name, consisting of seeking “massive damages.”
This creates what Activision calls an “actual and live controversy regarding the celebrations particular rights to utilize or register trademarks that consist of the word Warzone.” Activision also explains that both its own usage of Warzone, and the usage by, are far from the only games with similar titles.
Warzone.coms initial assertion for obstructing Activisions trademark was that the name triggered significant confusion in between Activisions Call of Duty game and the Warzone method video game. Activision declares in its complaint that the games are so various that confusion appears not likely, or even difficult.
“Activisions Call of Duty: Warzone could not be more different from Defendants game, a low-budget, specific niche virtual parlor game like Hasbros Risk where gamers take turns moving numbers (representing “armies”) across a map of the world. It is unthinkable that any member of the public might confuse the two products or think that they are associated with or associated to each other,” Activision says in its grievance.
Nevertheless, on a GoFundMe page set up to fund Warzone.coms legal battle with Activision, Randy Ficker, the designer of internet browser video game, declares that the confusion has actually already happened.
PS4] I send the same reply to each of them: Warzone and Call of Duty: Warzone are different video games. You must call Activision,” said Ficker in his post.
In its grievance, Activision says that it tried to work out a settlement. Nevertheless, after both sides rejected offers, Activision says stopped working out.
Now Activision is seeking an official judgment in the event, which it seems will be met Fickers own legal defense– according to his GoFundMe page.
Polygon has connected to Activision for comment.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *